Message in a Blog Post: Stewart Copeland thinks The Police sucked

Some friends of mine caught this show and said The Police seemed a bit off.   Stewart Copeland seems to think so too, as he makes clear on his blog.  Mistakes, ad libs, and digressions make a live show.  No lip synched perfection for me.  I love his insider’s view of the show:

OUR FIRST DISASTER GIG!.

Andy has started the opening guitar riff to MESSAGE IN A BOTTLE and the crowd is going nuts. Problem is, I missed hearing him start. Is he on the first time around or the second? I look over at Sting and he’s not much help, his cue is me – and I’m lost. Never mind. “Crack!” on the snare and I’m in, so Sting starts singing. Problem is, he heard my crack as two in the bar, but it was actually four – so we are half a bar out of sync with each other. Andy is in Idaho.
Well we are professionals so we soon get sorted, but the groove is eluding us. We crash through MESSAGE and then go strait into SYNCHRONICITY. But there is just something wrong. We just can’t get on the good foot. We shamble through the song and hit the big ending. Last night Sting did a big leap for the cut-off hit, and he makes the same move tonight, but he gets the footwork just a little bit wrong and doesn’t quite achieve lift-off. The mighty Sting momentarily looks like a petulant pansy instead of the god of rock. Never Mind. Next song is going to be great…
But it isn’t. We get to the end of the first verse and I snap into the chorus groove – and Sting doesn’t. He’s still in the verse. We’ll have to listen to the tapes tomorrow to see who screwed up, but we are so off kilter that Sting counts us in to begin the song again. This is ubeLIEVably lame. We are the mighty Police and we are totally at sea.
And so it goes, for song after song. All I can think about is how Dietmar is going to string us up. In rehearsal this afternoon we changed the keys of EVERY LITTLE THING and DON’T STAND SO CLOSE so needless to say Andy and Sting are now on-stage in front of twenty thousand fans playing avant-garde twelve-tone hodgepodges of both tunes. Lost, lost, lost.

Alberta creationism museum

Flintstones
Canada now has the unfortunate distinction of its own creationism museum in Big Valley Alberta, for those who, in the words of Warren Kinsella, think the Flintstones is a documentary:

Dinosaurs once walked alongside humans. The bloodline of King Henry
VI of England can be traced back to Adam and Eve. There’s proof in the
dirt beneath Saskatchewan that the biblical flood really happened.

And planet Earth is just 6,000 years old, give or take a few centuries.

Walk
through the doors of the Big Valley Creation Science Museum, and you
get a very different version of the planet’s past than gets taught in
most classrooms.

Set to open June 5, the 900-sq.-ft. bungalow
offers fossils, models of dinosaurs, multimedia presentations and
professional-looking displays – all designed to poke big holes in the
theory of evolution.

"This is a scientific museum," said founder
Harry Nibourg, a 46-year-old evangelical who built and stocked the
museum about 200 kilometres northeast of Calgary at a cost of about
$300,000 – mostly out of his own pocket.

"This is compelling
evidence for a creator. We want people to come take a look at it for
themselves and make up their own minds."

Vance Nelson, executive
director of Creation Truth Ministries, offers guided tours. He said
evolution is as much based on "blind faith" as creationism.

"I
have no problem with survival of the fittest," he said. "But survival
of the fittest does not explain the origin of the fittest.

"Who
was there to see the Big Bang? (Evolution is) based on presuppositions,
assumptions and biases like all historical theory. Creationism and
evolution are on the same level playing field and should be debated
that way."

This is believed to be Canada’s first permanent
creationist museum. There are several in the U.S., including one
opening in Kentucky on Monday that reportedly cost $27 million US to
build.
Critics, meanwhile, say they have no problem with creationism
– but they insist it can’t be called science if it’s based on a
theological concept that can’t be tested.

"Our goal is to
understand the natural world using what we can see or scientifically
prove," said Heather Addy, an biology instructor at the University of
Calgary.

"When you invoke a supernatural being as a creator that is not science, and shouldn’t be taught as science."

No kidding.

Everyone hates Rachel Carson

Last week it seemed like hit pieces were popping up everywhere on Rachel Carson.  Deltoid has been doing a yeoman’s job of documenting the atrocities.  He can add this little screed by Margaret Wente to the pile.   Why now?, I wondered as I counted the errors in Wente’s piece.  Now I know of course that her 100th birthday just passed and this seems to have provoked a predictable round of calumnies form the denialist industry about her supposed  responsibility for malarial deaths arising from restricted use of DDT.  I can’t add much to the light shed on the issue by Deltoid.  I lived in Indonesia for a number of years and they regularly sprayed DDT to suppress malaria. I had always understood that the bans on DDT were for agricultural use only, not for combatting insect-borne illness.  Deltoid also rightly points out that banning agricultural use of DDT likely delayed the evolution of DDT-resistant mosquitoes, thereby saving lives.

Today Kevin Drum covers it as well:

Is DDT a banned substance? Answer: for widespread
agricultural use, which produces increased resistance in many insect
populations, yes. For vector control (primarily to contain
mosquito-borne malaria), no.

For the last decade or so, however, a group of right-wing "sound
science" advocates has been implying that the agricultural ban on DDT
is really a blanket ban and that millions of poor Africans have died as
a result. Why? DDT isn’t patented and is only minimally profitable, so
it’s not as if the DDT industry is bothering to push this. So who is?

Short answer: the tobacco industry. Surprise! Turns out that the DDT
disinformation campaign was really an effort to discredit the World
Health Organization, which was planning a major anti-smoking initiative
back in 1998. Discredit WHO on malaria, and you discredit WHO on its
anti-smoking activism. And all the while you get to look like you’re
standing up for millions of impoversished black Africans. Neat, eh?

In my view this is also about discrediting the scientific consensus on climate change.  The argument being that we listened to the crazy environmentalists about DDT and millions died, and now they are leading us down the same path with the climate change "myth".

Dengue Mosquito genome sequenced

Link: CBC: Genetic map of deadly mosquito revealed:

A complete map of the Aedes aegypti‘s DNA was published Thursday, just the second time scientists have sequenced the genome of a mosquito. A genetic sequence of Anopheles gambiae, the mosquito that carries malaria, was published in 2002.

Writing in the journal Science, the international team of scientists said the Aedes aegypti
genome is five times longer than that of its malaria-carrying relative
and carries unique proteins and genes that make it hardier than most
insects.

The breakthrough is the first step in a long process scientists hope
will lead to insecticides more capable of dealing with the insects or
genetically engineered versions of the insects that would be resistant
to the viruses that transmit the diseases….

Aedes aegypti is known to carry yellow fever and dengue fever.
Yellow fever kills about 30,000 people a year and is common in West and
Central Africa and parts of South America. Dengue fever kills about
25,000 people annually and occurs in about 100 countries…


I’m ok with gas “gouging”

A new study on gas prices by the  Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (Gas Price Gouge: The Sequel) has generated a lot of news in Vancouver. Understandably so, as the report claims that we are ‘overpaying’ by 27 cents a litre here.  I haven’t read the report yet so I have no comment on the methods used or embedded assumptions, but I find myself resistant to the idea of ‘normal profit margins’. I really don’t have a problem with a company charging whatever it wants for its product, as long as there is no monopoly or collusion in play.  Oil companies seem to have discovered that consumers, despite war or disaster induced price hikes, are willing to pay more. So they are charging more.  How is this different from any other industry?  People make their own choices and if they want to commute alone in a gas guzzling vehicle, and want to pay a mint for it, so what?   Others make different choices:

VANCOUVER (NEWS1130) – Gas price pains
appear to be driving people out of their cars. More people appear to be
turning to transit and car pooling. TransLink says overall transit use
was up 3% for the first quarter of the year, and up more than 11.5% on
West Coast Express. The big gas price hike happened in April, and
TransLink is still waiting for official ridership numbers for that time
period.

Leon Tuebes at the Jack Bell Foundation says there is also more
interest in van pooling, car pooling and ride sharing. "The biggest
surge we’ve seen is for people looking for other people to car pool
with them in their car, or to find someone willing to share a ride in
their private vehicles."

Tuebes believes once the price of gas hits a $1.30, there will be a
sudden spike in people looking for alternatives to single occupant car
use. He says at that price, even sharing one or two trips a week can
make a big difference. He says the number of hits on their car pooling
website has gone up 25% since February as people check out other ways
to get around.

Let the price of gas soar, says I.

how the hell did that happen?

Which God or Goddess are you like?

Your Result: The Christian God
 

You are the Holy Lord. You are the shepherd and those that follow you are your lambs. You are kind and patient, but when need be, you are vile and creul. You are often asked for advise or wisdom, and you willingly give it. Congratulations!! You are God!!

Jesus
 
Budha
 
Goddess Bast
 
God Zeus
 
Goddess Sekhemet
 
You are your own God or Goddess
 
Satan
 
Which God or Goddess are you like?
Make Your Own Quiz

I was going for Zeus